Tuesday 29 December 2015

Film openings

What is a film opening?
Depending on the genre depends on what how the opening of a film is set out. Although all openings have the same concept, just set out differently, they set the scene, so the audience knows/ can predict what the stories about. For example if it's an animated film -ie. Disney films- they hold serenity at the beginning, its at a calm pace and its clear and peaceful, so the audience can follow and learn what this story is. Whereas a horror might leave the audience hanging a bit more, it may still set the scene- perhaps tell the audience of an evil or imply the evil is around, building up that genre from the beginning.

Why's film openings so important?
Without a film opening the audience would be lost and not know what was happening, they wouldn't really know what to predict in the following scenes. These openings are very important when creating a film because it sets the scene and tells the story, this is normally when there is a narrator, even though people barely notice, the narrator is normally present at the beginning and the end because it shows a complete circle of events.

Types of openings...
Flash backs.
Planning of landscape- set and inform where the story is set.
Narrations.
Action scene- to intrigue the audience in a fast pace scene
Chase scene- similar the the Action scene to catch the attention

My exampled of a film opening is from the women in black. Horrors are my personal favorite and believe they are very good at conveying opening to create tension and raise questions to further draw the audience into watching the rest of the film. The women in black (linked here) is a film about a small town who's children are being killed but the cause is unknown to all the adults. Throughout the opening there is a creepy tune that sounds as if it should be a nursery rhyme just slowed right down. This is the only sound throughout the opening- other than the scream from what must be the mother. The lack of speech suggests an almost hypnotic sense taking over this innocent children.
The first thing shown is a china set of tea cups and pot suggesting a play of "make believe", most horrors use children to help the portrayal of a psychological scare because they are meant to be innocent and free minded. As shown on the picture on the right, you can see an old fashion nursery room/ play room suggesting these children are families of class or wealth. This would have been set many years ago, those with class never had anything happen to them, well nothing that was revealed anyway. These children would have been left up there and known they would play without any harm. Although the music on top of this suggests otherwise.

The caring and nurturing of the dolls, the giving them drink and tucking them in the bed suggests that these girls aren't evil or horrible, they are innocent children doing what most children done. This is important when creating tension in this case for an opening because if the audience didn't know what genre this was, and there was no sound, this may have been taken very differently. However, the dark tone of the shots suggests this isn't a happy place to be, even if the children are smiling away. The darkness suggests danger, their safe play room, is no longer safe for them. This is also important when creating an opening because it suggests this happens very regularly so even the sun doesn't bother to come out as this is a forever mourning. The audience may then be lead to engage with the film and want to find out more to why these children are smiling yet the music says they shouldn't be.    

Continuing into the opening scene, the girls stop what they are doing completely and in sync look at the door then to the window. The bells in the music begin to get louder suggesting something is about to occur. The first glance of the three girls raises questions of who are they looking at, as we can't hear anything we do not know whether they are being spoken to or they being hypnotized. The way these girls are in sync creates are very creepy and eary feeling to the audience. Children don't normally do things in sync, this is abnormal and it draws in the audience.

The smashing of the china cups and dolls that were once in the hands of the innocent and caring children, are now being broken and smashed. As if the girls never cared for them. The killing of the dolls foreshadows the unsure emotion impacting on the audience because it seems they are possessed. Especially when it is shown the girls are walking over to a window, opening it as if a door. This further implies that the thing doing this to all the children doesn't physically do it themselves, but it's the children doing it. Which is very important to an opening scene as the audience is left wanting to see what is causing this and why.
The end of this scene is a pan out to show the room, in the corner shows someone in a black veil, looking at the name suggests this is the "woman in black". Yet it's important for the opening to not reveal everything, hence why this subject has their back to the camera and only half the head is shown.

Tuesday 15 December 2015

Theoretical approaches to media representations of youth

Gramsci: Hegemony, the ideological influence of the bourgeoise and the proletariat
Hebdige: i believe media representations of young people portray them as either fun or trouble. Wrote a book about the importance of the style to youth subcultures. youth as fun/ trouble, youth subcultures resist hegemony through style.
Acland: the concept of the ideology of protection, anti-social youth reinforces hegemony.
             The effect of television on viewers, the repetitive nature of television means that over time tv influences how people see the world, cultivation theory.


Ann gould identified 6 ket stereotypes in the media's representation of youth…
- rebellious
-Artificial tribe
-sexual
-Nihilistic
-violent
-self-destructive

Bikers- trouble makers- "scooters"
swearing
slang-uneducated
drugs??
sly meetings
staring at women
smoking.
women- UV lighting- tanning.
"You wanna watch it you know" threating each other.
"Riot police fly" - newspaper article.
Fighting each other by singing over each other
Fight then automatically making up.
Leather jacket.
"what am I black or summin?"
Checking the mirror- self centred
"banged up- as if it was a good thing.
Getting high in a bath room
Partying
camera view- serval people in shot outside the house- showing the shadows of people dancing.
 Anti-stereotype- boy "boyfriend of host" dressed well, well spoken.
Drinking.
Loud music in the party scene- inconsiderate of the neighbours.
Big paintings in the house- suggesting wealth, but the rebellious boys have gate crashed, running the class of the party.
Going to a party looking for women.
damaging the property- smashing glass- the sound tells us this- can't see it though- dark room.
Stealing the bike.
Always taking drugs
ruining the gardens- the flowers- trouble makers, rude

Being a  post boy- serving the adults- younger generation used for their work.
Adults much better spoken
boy throwing up- hung over.
Adults ignoring it- probably happens all the time, regular, its normal, not phased by it.
Coming home late- not telling parents.
Mum "it's not normal"- looking down on him.
"pop by" with out consent.
Camera- in the shed- them out- children are forever outside.
"don't wannna be the same as everyone"
Betting, smoking dark light- rebel, ill gel, they know they are doing wrong, so do it in the dark- so they can't be caught.

In the work office, he isn't as much as a "rude" boy compared to when his friends- still slang- no swearing though

"what we gonna do bout pills then"
Having to be kicked out of the restaurant.
Looking for a fight- kicking his bike- he hadn't done anything.
Being sexist "what one are you boy or girl"
going others pain.
"gonna kill em"- sticking together
There are different groups.
so much energy
Camera- following them ride on their bike.
gangs
Damaging public property
"I don't know I don't have a watch"- being scarastic to parents.

distoring his car.
damaging other peoples property- in the dark.
everything done bad is in dark light- they know they are doing wrong.
breaking and entering

buying love with drugs
cheating on each other- in the dark! lighting is far right. can nearly see them- in an alley.


Media-tv- staring into the tv.
adults- as if it's a different world compared to teenagers. "I could play better than that"
"that racket"
"that'll make you death you know"

Massive crowd of people, but there stand out significantly compared with the adults- adults dressed normally- they in green jackets.
running from police
confronting the police

causing havoc on the beach
camera quickly cutting for scene to scene
each shoot contained many people
lots of fighting

Quadrophenia essay.

After watching the film Quadrophenia, it implies that ageism was present in the time this was produced. Forming a very negative stereotype of teenagers- suggesting they are all very rude, trouble makers and disruptive. As Cohen claims, films such as Quadrophenia are exaggerated and distort the truth because he found through research that there was little evidence which he could find that such clashes between rival groups of motor-cycle scooter gangs actually took place. Supported by Gould who identified 6 stereotypes which the media forms around a teenager, Quadrophenia ticks most of the given stereotypes. Thus suggesting the film Quadrophenia is a media representation of a biased view of teenagers.

The opening of the film presents (alongside the credits) bikers taking up the entire road and getting in the way of everyone else, being disruptive. Automatically the mise-en-scene of the biker gang conveys a troubling view of these adolescents, not to mention the daring atmosphere- not worried about being hit off the bike, they just want the show off in front of each other- already showing the relevance of Gould's stereotype list- especially the rebellious one.. There is already a stereotype forming around these characters and all we have seen in them riding their bikes. As theorist Cohen suggests, this portrayal of teenagers is massively incorrect and biased because there is little evidence to imply teenagers actually behave in this manor. The speech of these adolescents is rather poor suggesting uneducated, slang is very key here, alongside the swearing which is used every other word between teenagers. In the opening part of this film, there is a sneaky sense that they may be doing drugs- acting suspicious down an alley. Not with standing this, female teenagers here are suggested to be male orientated because they are for the view of the male gaze- just as theorist Laura Mulvey claims- women are objects for the male pleasure. Additionally there is a scene of what seems to be a public bathroom, where too male characters are trying to compete on who can see the loudest and who has the better music taste. This petty fight soon stops when they see each other. The form of the irrelevant argument shows how the creator of this film suggests teenagers would be rude to anyone-yet when they know them, they'd stop.

However as shown later on in the film, even though there isn't a lot of dominance shown by the rebellious age group of teenage trouble makers, if they need money- as a job, they will present a more polite behavior, swearing is less common. Suggesting that there is a small hierarchy between ages. However when the main character is with his parents this hierarchy is not present, he is very rude and informal, neglecting the idea which they should respect their elders.

Thursday 10 December 2015

The male gaze

The male gaze and the contemporary representation of women in the media, to what extent do Mulvey's theory on the male gaze and Schroeder's contemporary media texts. 
Easy A scene
Mulvey-….
Tight corset- black (meant to the the slimming colour of clothing) and it is silky- sexy.
Revealing clothes
Sun glasses- mysterious- bitting the glasses when talking
Pearls
Air kissing men- teasing them
Boys moving out- making a pathway
Looking her up and down
"Boy I will be your sexy silk"- music, smooth music.
Throwing herself at men.
Even girls at watching her.
Shaking hips as she walks- not talking to those looking at her- leaving them hanging- giving them something to look at- even when she's walked past the boys are continuing to gaze at her- shown from the camera shoot at 20 seconds.
lick off food on the fork- making the boys fall for her.
Longing out the words- Dumb to be pretty- to get the attention from men-
       BUT… Use of longer words- anagram, Rhetorical question
She's doing it to prove a point, if people think she's like that, she decides to dress like it. She doesn't normally dress in this way. Although as she is, all the boys are falling at their knees for her (literally)- she's being very revealing- the part small section at the end of this clip shows how she isn't actually like this- her teacher is shocked because it is abnormal for her- she quickly removes the fork from her mouth because obviously this show wasn't for her teacher it was to teach her ex-estfriend and lesson for calling her a "slag"

Schroeder- The idea that the gazer is more superior to the object of the gaze.
Doesn't apply here- she is the one walking in the light- she is making a corridor in the people- they are moving for her- not the other way round- it seems for her that her beauty is the thing that is giving her the power in this case. Also she is wearing the sunglasses at the beginning part of the clip- showing she isn't giving eye contact because she doesn't have to- everyone is looking at her, not the other way round, she has the power in this school corridor, in this scene anyway...

START OF ESSAY HERE....
Mulvey is a feminist theorist who came up with the idea of the 'male gaze' objectifying women in different media texts. Also she believes women are presented as sexual objects for the enjoyment of the male audience. From the above clip, Easy A, it supports Mulvey's perspective and view. However if you were to watch the entire film, it would be noticed that this isn't actually how this character is and is doing this just to prove a point- although this short clip does portray Mulvey's view very well. For starters, the simple mise-en-scene of watch she is wearing suggests this objectification of women as she is clearly showing too much skin, a "sexy" black silky tight corset- making it easier for the camera to follow her curves, along with all the men around her. Also, the mysterious use of sunglasses continues to show the male gaze because she doesn't need to show her eyes because that is clearly not what everyone is looking at- in contrast of what the normal "first impressions" should be, "her beautiful eyes". This shows how men clearly look at the body, especially if revealed like this character is. Even the simplicity of the walking down the corridor shaking her hips as she passes all the drawn eyes- not stopping to speak to anyone because she wants their gaze to follow her, this is a very teasing way of walking because it leaves them wanting more really. Also this shows the male gaze as they clearly can't take their eyes off her. Prior to this clip, she wasn't very popular, however as soon as she reveals herself in this way, she gains lots of attention. Suggesting by Mulvey's view, women can only be noticed properly if they can supply the interest in male views.

Additionally, as she walks through the parting sea of males, the camera doesn't go off of her, showing either a close up of her face or a body shot showing the surrounding people. This would have been important for showing the male gaze because it shows all the men not taking their eyes of her. This is also joined by the teasing smirk she has as she walks, alongside blow kisses at the men. However, when looking at Schroeder's view of the gazer being more superior compared to object of the gaze doesn't apply here. This character clearly has more superior in this case purely for the fact that she is the one parting the crowd of people, she isn't moving out the way. Also the way she has sunglasses on goes against this view because the fact you can't see her eyes shows she doesn't have to give people eye contact, as she is being watched not her looking at someone else.

However, even though many films convey Mulvey's view upon the male gaze, there are some that do not. For example, even if there is parts of the film showing a typical male view, Charlies angels also shows the empowerment of women. Notwithstanding that the Female gaze is shown as well. For example they are looking through binoculars as a man saying "yummy", this suggests that it's not only men objectifying the opposite gender- thus suggesting Mulvey's view is only half the truth, yes women are objectified through men, but women can be just as bad. Charlie's Angels shows women's empowerment by a selection of different activities that would stereo-typically be seen for a males enjoyment only. An example of this is the
monster truck racing and the women betting money with lots of men- showing she has the power the beat them. Also, in the trailer (linked below), a female character says "I'm here to save you" showing a contrast to the stereo-typical "damsel in distress". This suggests that even though Mulvey's view is present in most film, the extent to which it's relevant in all can be low- especially in films such as Charlie's Angels.
Charlie's Angels trailer
(Notes shown on previous blog)

Gender representation notes

The male gaze: Objectification- women exist in a media purely for the interest of the men.
How men look at women
how women look at themselves
how women look at other women

Archetype-
Stereotype-
Laura Mulvey: she is a theorist and a feminist and came up with the concept on male gaze in 1975.
here Mulvey wrote a very influential essay, 'visual pleasure and narrative cinema' starting that women art used of visual pleasure- women are made to seem like sexual objects through voyeurism
She believes that in film audiences have to 'view' characters from the perspective of a heterosexual male.
Women are presented as sexual spectacle show objects of pleasure for the characters and audience. she believed that perspective of a heterosexual male.
Stating that the way women are viewed in cinema is 'unequal'.
The camera necessarily present women as 'sexualised for the pleasure of men.
Men fetishies women which she referred to as 'fetishistic scopophila'
Men have this gaze to avoid being 'castrated'.

The camera lingers on the curves of the female body.

Facial expressions...
Women: Super-smiler, Romantic or sexual
Men: Carefree, practical.

"To gaze implies more than to look at- it signifies a psychological relationship to power, in which the gazer is superior to the object of the gaze"

Charlie's Angels

Examples of female empowerment and sexuality.
Surfing
Low tops
Short skirts



5 examples of empowerment
- Firing guns at motorbike
- Punching the window
- Women betting men.
- fly kicking men
- Throwing him on the floor.
-Saving men
-
5 examples of sexuality
- The surfing- bikini- exploiting their bodies
- Short skirts
- Strip show
- In underwear with long fur coat
- Male boss


1984: Miriam Hanson, put forth the idea that women are also able to view male characters as erotic objects of desire.
Since 1980's there has been a large increase in sexualisation and display of male body.


HOMEWORK- Draw reference from charlie angles and one other media text within

Tuesday 1 December 2015

Vladimir Propp, Guardians of the galaxy


The hero- someone who seeks something
The villain- who opposes or blocks the hero's quest
The donor- who provides an object which has some magical property
The helper- aids the hero
The princess- Acts as a reward for the hero
Her father- rewards the hero of his actions
The dispatcher- who sends the hero on his way by providing a message
The False hero- Who disrupts the hero's hope by pressing false claims.

Alongside the 8 character roles, Propp proposed there was 31 functions to help provide a structure in the media text- in this case the film.
These 31 functions are shown below from the power-point presentation shown in class
...


The villain
The princess.
The magical object- no donor.
The hero- Star lord.
The helpers to the hero.

Tuesday 17 November 2015

Todorov's Theory.

Todorov's theory.

Todorov in 1969 produced a theory which he believed to be able to be applied to any film. He believe that all films followed the same narrative pattern…
The equilibrium- When there is all serenity and everyone is equal.
disequilibrium-When conflict rises between two people or two groups- thee becomes a problem.
acknowledgement- They realise there is a problem
solving-They try solving it
and then again equilibrium-goes back to equality .


Maleficent...
Clip 1-  opening.
Straight from the beginning of this clip it suggests that there is equilibrium because it is all calm and peaceful, living happily together- on their separate sides- the fairy tale side and the "human side". This screen shot was at 0:05 because even the miss en scene here shows the equilibrium atmosphere that is being portrayed at the opening of this film. In terms of Togorov's theory, this is the correct way and the way most films start. Even the tone of the narrator continues the serenity portrayed within this film.


 At 0:41, the sound effects of the diegetic sound of the water is a key example of equilibrium because when the sound of water is heard, it is normally linked with serenity and calmness.




At 0:52, a child is shown- the most common thing to be included when showing equilibrium. Also as you can see in this screen shot there is an almost hazy view- blurry- around the child, suggesting the world around her is very hazy and goes how it goes.



Again at 1:41, Equilibrium is maintained by the music of Non-diegetic sound because it is very fast yet isn't tense- it flows with Maleficent as her flies around.
 At 2:06 of this clip, fairies around flying around above the water leaving behind a golden trail of "fairy dust". The reason this makes the equality feeling clear is because gold is a very happy as it is the same colour of the sun.




As this clip is the opening, it is a good example of Todorov's theory because it proves how its equilibrium to begin with.

Clip 3- Maleficent loses her wings.
Near the beginning of this clip- 1:06, it suggests there to be equilibrium. However the lighting contrasts the atmosphere made by the narrator. The lighting suggests something bad is going to happen, it's just Maleficent doesn't know it yet. Suggesting a disruption about to occur.



At 3:05, it shows what the disruption is, the man has taken away her wings. Which is obviously going to cause her lots of pain alongside the feeling of betrayal from that man because clear she trusted him, yet by the looks of this clip, he must have given her something to make her sleep, going even more against her trust.





Clip 4- True loves kiss
At the beginning of this clip, There is a disruption, the boy kissed aurora but the cursed wasn't lifted. This is a disruption because it was meant to wake her from her slumber. The screen shot on the side of this is at 0:59, just after he kissed her with no response. For the fairies shown in this screen grab, this is a very big problem because Aurora still hasn't been woken, she is a princess so she needs to be woken as soon as possible. Yet they have found the wrong boy.
This was taken at 2:38- a really touching scene of Maleficent when it shows the pain that she is going through and the upset she has that she made that curse. Her kissing her forehead shows she is beginning to accept that Aurora won't be waking up due to her own disruption because true loves kissed hasn't yet occurred, she has recognised the disruption and wakes to cure it yet she can't.

Yet at 3:02, Aurora actually wakes up as a result of Maleficent's kiss. A start of the break of the disruption. As if she has managed to repair some of the disruption accidently. There for suggesting, after this there may be a restoring of equilibrium.


As this is the final scene of Maleficent, it shows golden fairy dust much like the opening suggesting a full circle and a restoring of equilibrium as it has gone back to happy and hazy like before. With bright colours fulling the screen, like shown in the screen shot taken at 12 seconds. The second screen shot on the right was at 1:55, showing all serenity. 

Narrative theory Protagonist

Narrative: A story of written/ spoken continuous events. The primary function of most films is to tell a story… The miss en scene, cinematography, editing and sound are entirely subservient to the narrative, creating a seamless flow that centers the viewer within the story.

Narrative conventions: Must have a hero (protagonist), the problems faced by the protagonist, the resolution of these problems. Everything centers around the hero.
The plot is then about removing unfulfiling desire.

Protagonist:  The leading character or one of the major characters in a play/film/story. The good guy in the film

Antagonist: The character who actively opposes someone or something. The bad guy in the film. IT is an obstacle that the protagonist must overcome.


Captain Philips…
The protagonist in this film trailer is Captain Phillips who is faced with a problem of pirates and has to protect the people on his ship. He does this by contacting the people back on land automatically which is shown at 23 seconds on the second trailer we watched this shows power as he is clearly in charge of the ship. Then at 40 seconds he puts on the fire hose/ water canons all the way around the ship almost as a shield to protect people. Then at 47 seconds, it is Captain Phillips who is the one to inform everyone to hide as they have been invaded by pirates, the reason this would show he is the protagonist is because he is clearly a leading role and plays a major part in keeping his ship mates safe- at 1:00, he says "It'll be alright" reassuring them that he will make sure they survive this so they won't be running scared riot. When the main pirate Antagonist- Abduwali Muse, opposes a threat towards the Protagonist and his crew at 1:05, he takes the bullet for them and says "If your going to shot someone shot me!", making sure he is the one that hurt and not them. Then when Abduwali says "Look at me, Look at me, I'm the captain now" at 1:15, it is very clear that he is clearly opposing Captain Phillips and is becoming an obstacle for the captain to over come.  Then the pirate says on the loudspeaker "1 minute and I kill all of your friends" at 1:19, clearly showing the power the antagonist is trying to have against Captain Phillips along with his crew. When it is shouted at the Captain "You come with us" at 1:22, it shows the threat put up against him by the pirates and is followed by the captain saying "I've got to get them off this ship!" when replying to a ship mate telling him not to get in the boat. This also portrays the bravery that Captain Phillips has even if he is terrified; for the good of his ship he isn't showing it, thus letting the pirates abduct him- to protect everyone else. The fact that he done this shows that he is a protagonist because he is being a hero and making his ship mates safer. The bravery from Captain Phillips is a key element of a protagonist. Yet contrasting this, the ambush on the ship from the pirates clearly conveys the antagonist role of Abduwali Muse.

The avengers…
Screen shot 1! (0:36)
Screen shot 2! (0:24)
Screen shot 3! (0:48)
Screen shot 4! (0:54)
Automatically, at 36 seconds in this clip, character "Loki" played by Tom Hiddelstone, he is portrayed as an antagonist as he shots at a plane like object as shown in the first screenshot on the left. It also is implied here that he is being a threat towards "Captain America"- shown even before this time at the confrontation at 8-30 seconds as shown on screen shot 2 on the right. Seeing as Captain America is suggested to be the "protagonist" due to him blocking a bullet from a civilian- Loki is clearly a threat towards him, giving him an almost "competition". As shown at 48 seconds, Loki is caught swinging for Captain America when in confrontation- as shown in screen shot 3 on the left. This clearly suggests Loki is the antagonist in this situation because he obviously opposes the protagonist who is only trying to protect people. Even the low camera shot at 54 seconds suggests Loki being an antagonist because it suggests more power over Captain America- especially seeing at he is holding something on top of Captain America, pushing him down (as shown on screen shot 4 on the right).


Anti-hero- a major character usually the protagonist who lacks conventional mobility of mind and who struggles for values not deemed universally admirable.

Breaking Bad…
The Character Walter White played by Bryan Cranston in Breaking Bad is shown as an Anti-hero in the clip just shown because he is clearly a major character yet seems to be diagnosed with a terminal illness and has money issues- wanting to help his family more as he is a school teacher yet aren't making ends meet. The fact that his morals are in the right place would make him seen as a protagonist, but by doing socially unacceptable things such as "cooking crystal meth" isn't "brave" it can be seen by many as wrong. Thus suggesting he is an anti-hero. He is doing something that is basically illegal yet it doing it for his family as he has no other choice. We as an audience feel sorry for him yet know what he is doing is wrong.

Foil- any character (usually the antagonist or an important supporting character) whose personal qualities contrast with another character (usually the protagonist). By providing this contrast, we get to know more about the other character.

Sherlock holmes…
Adventurous
obsessive
impulsive

Watson…
Calm
Mundane


Saturday 14 November 2015

Lord Of The Rings Opening- Sound Analysis

At the beginning of this clip, it is complete darkness yet, through Non-Diegetic sound of narration, it creates automatic tension- It's taken away one of the audiences senses yet leaves them with just hearing a low whisper. This mysterious opening leaves tension as the audience set down to engage into the film. This lasts for 1 minute with a gradual rise in the music.


The first image after the title screen is a fire joined by Non-diegetic sound effects of the crackling of the burning. This may create foreshadowing towards the audience for later in the film- at the beginning they are using fire for enjoyment and food, perhaps later on in the film fire is used as a deterrent. The sound effect helps set the scene of this because if it was silent, the effect may differ- maybe it would just be a memory instead of reality.
 During 1:20 continuing to the majority of the clip, the use of Non-diegetic sound is used to almost help set the scene as it is telling the story of what has happened before once the visual part is playing through. Although do the monotone of the narrator implies a build up- to let the audience know the story will soon pick up pace alongside building up tension.


Yet at 1.52 the Non-diegetic sound of music beginnings to become upbeat and faster- perhaps to cause more tension thus leaving it more dramatic.






  At 1:57, non-diegetic sound of sound effect is played alongside the narrator. The narrator at this point in time has began to speed up between each point made and is speaking much more louder, this fits in with the sound effect played here because it over rides the peaceful keyboard music - suggesting this person shown is a very evil/bad character. Therefore building up suspense in the audiences mind.

  This Non-diegetic sound effect of a thunder clap gets louder at 2:02 because obviously the director wants the audience to work out this is the "bad guy" and he shouldn't have a ring like all the other people explain prior.




Although at 2:09 we are already starting to see a change in meaning with the Non-diegetic sound of the fire effect for showing power and dominance, in direct contrast to the beginning of the clip when fire was the use of simple enjoyment- marshmallows.





As predicted in the screen shot from 1:08, One minute later at 2:10, fire has created havoc as it is burning houses leaving people running helplessly away- this is helped be portrayed by the non-diegetic sound effect of crackling fire. Alongside the screens of course because this suggests a worried and scared atmosphere which has been created.


However at 2:27, the non-diegetic sounding of the music comes back, although unlike the original music, this is much more powerful and uplifting, as if this person who "resisted" is a brave and good character, rather than the bad seeming character portray before.




However, at 2:37 there is one of the first uses of diegetic sound, the grunts and shouts from the people shown in the screen shot besides. This is important in telling the narrative because it shows it imposing threat the solider type people have before reaching their "freedom"- showing the audience what they need to fight.



At 2:49 there is more diegtic sound by what looks like a leader- as if a scream of charge... Commencing the battle. This suggests a war that will abruptly start due to this command.

Star Wars Trailer- Sound analysis.

During the majority of the trailer there is Non diegetic sound which is used to portray serenity as the music is played by high keys on a piano
, yet could be ironic as energy may soon rise. This could be used to create questions in the audience about how this film will be.



Although at 1:10 the of the Non-diegetic sound contrasts the beginning part, it starts to pick up pace. This Informs the story line of the film because it suggests the film won't be simple, it will take a sharp turn. Foreshadowing perhaps a war.




The first clear Diegetic sound is shown at 1:15, yet it is only for one second- very short and sharp. This may have been used to suggest the importance of the story line itself rather than the speech. The fact it's short creates tension as it leaves questions to What is "All of it" and how does it relate?



There is also Non-Diegetic sound used at 1:20 in terms of the sound effects. This was used to show the audience the flying object in both sight and hearing. This would have been used to set the scene.






Despite the lack of  Diegetic sound, Non-diegetic sound is used throughout this trailer in terms of narrative, this helps raise the tension because as the music gets louder, the short statements said become more powerful more moving and more questions are left behind. Making the specific target audience want to watch the entire film to find out more.